LionAGI — expanded note
URL: https://github.com/khive-ai/lionagi
Status: OK
Quick summary
LionAGI is an orchestration framework / “intelligence OS” for building structured, multi-step AI workflows that combine LLMs, tool integrations, and programmatic validation. It emphasizes typed I/O (Pydantic), ReAct-style reasoning + acting, multi-model/provider support, and observability (action logs, branch histories). It’s designed for reproducible, debuggable agentic flows rather than one-off chat usage.
Core concepts (at a glance)
- Branches (conversation / workflow contexts) to hold prompt state and history.
- Pydantic-typed responses and validators to make outputs structured and machine-consumable.
- ReAct-style flows: reason → call tool → observe → continue reasoning.
- Tool adapters: user-provided code that LLMs can call (APIs, shell, CI, device-management).
- Multi-provider model support: route tasks to different LLM providers or local engines.
- Observability: message/action logs, DataFrame-friendly history export, verbose chain-of-thought for debugging.
Typical architectures & components
- Model Provider Layer: OpenAI / Anthropic / Perplexity / Ollama / custom.
- Orchestration Layer: LionAGI Branches & planners that decide which tools to call and how to sequence steps.
- Tool Layer: adapters for external systems (HTTP APIs, CI runners, device managers, test harnesses).
- Storage / Retrieval: optional RAG components (embedding stores, vector DB) integrated per-project.
- Monitoring / Logging: store action logs for auditing, replay, and debugging.
Example workflows (concrete use cases)
- Multi-step analysis: LLM synthesizes evidence, calls document-parse tool, then produces structured summary.
- Programmatic test generation: convert user acceptance criteria into typed test steps (Pydantic schema), dispatch runners, collect results.
- Autonomous triage: detect failure, fetch logs, summarize, create prioritized issue with suggested fix.
- Continuous synthetic monitoring: scheduled runbooks that exercise endpoints/devices and create alerts + runbooks automatically.
Getting started (short)
- Install (check repo for latest): pip install lionagi
- Create a Branch, wire a model provider, define Pydantic schemas for structured outputs, and add tool adapters for external actions.
- Use verbose ReAct mode for development to observe chain-of-thought before switching to production-safe modes.
(Implementation details and exact API calls are in the repo README — check https://github.com/khive-ai/lionagi.)
Best practices
- Use Pydantic schemas to constrain model outputs; validate early.
- Keep tooling adapters thin and idempotent. Log all inputs/outputs.
- Add safety checks / human-in-the-loop gates for destructive actions.
- Rate-limit model calls and cache repeated prompts/pieces of context where possible.
- Instrument action logs for auditability — make logs exportable to DataFrames or logs storage.
Integrations to consider
- CI systems: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins (to dispatch tests or create PRs).
- Device management: FleetDM, MDM APIs for fleet-targeted tests or deployment checks.
- Observability & metrics: Prometheus, Sentry, ELK — export run metrics and failures.
- Issue trackers: GitHub Issues, Jira — auto-create and populate tickets with structured outputs.
- Vector DBs & retrieval: Pinecone, Milvus, Weaviate — when combining with RAG.
Benefits / strengths
- Strong emphasis on typed, validated outputs (reduces downstream brittleness).
- Suited for complex, multi-step flows that require tool calls and branching logic.
- Transparent debugging through verbose action logs and ReAct traces.
- Multi-model flexibility for best-of-breed routing (e.g., one model for summarization, another for planning).
Limitations / risks
-
Not a turnkey product for any single application — you build adapters and schemas.
-
LLM cost and latency at scale — plan caching and rate-limits.
-
Automated remediation or destructive actions require strict guardrails and testing.
-
If you need heavy data-centric RAG features, you’ll likely need to integrate a separate indexing layer.
Architecture — orchestration & fleet patterns
This compact architecture shows how LionAGI fits as an orchestration layer for multi-step AI workflows (including QE/fleet use cases). It focuses on components, data flows, scaling considerations, and guardrails.
Goals
- Use LionAGI to orchestrate typed, auditable workflows that combine LLM planning with deterministic tool actions.
- Support dispatching work to a fleet of runners (CI agents, device agents, FleetDM-managed hosts).
- Maintain observability, replayability, and safety for automated or semi-automated remediation.
High-level components
- Model Provider Layer
- Providers: OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, Ollama, internal models
- Responsibilities: LLM inference, routing to best model per task
- LionAGI Orchestration Layer
- Branches: workflow contexts and histories
- Planners/ReAct controllers: decide actions, call tools, loop until goal
- Validators: Pydantic schemas and custom checks
- Action logs: structured records of tool calls and agent reasoning
- Tool & Adapter Layer
- CI/API adapters: GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins
- Device management adapters: FleetDM, MDM API, SSH, OTA services
- Test harnesses: test runners, synthetic monitoring agents, fuzzers
- Ticketing/Issue adapters: GitHub Issues, Jira
- Storage & Retrieval
- Artifact store: object storage (S3) for logs, screenshots, traces
- Vector DB / RAG: Pinecone, Milvus, Weaviate for contextual retrieval
- Metadata DB: lightweight relational DB for run metadata, indexing
- Observability & Control Plane
- Logging: ELK / Loki / structured logs (JSON), exportable DataFrames
- Metrics & Alerts: Prometheus + Alertmanager, SLO dashboards
- Human-in-the-loop UI: approvals, manual triage, PR review
Data flow (simple sequence)
- User or schedule triggers a workflow (goal) in LionAGI.
- Branch planner asks an LLM to decompose the goal into typed steps (Pydantic TestPlan).
- For each step, planner chooses a target runner using adapters (FleetDM query or CI tag) and dispatches via a tool call.
- Runner executes test, uploads artifacts to object store, and posts result to a callback endpoint or polled endpoint.
- LionAGI action log records the tool call and response; LLM reasons on results and decides next steps (retry, escalate, file issue).
- If issue creation is chosen, an adapter creates a ticket with a structured payload and links to artifacts.
- Final structured summary (Pydantic TestResultSummary) is emitted and stored with the run metadata.
Diagram (Graphviz)
digraph lionagi_arch {
rankdir=LR;
node [shape=box, style=rounded];
user [label="User / Scheduler"];
lionagi [label="LionAGI\n(Branch / Planner / Validators)"];
models [label="Model Providers\n(OpenAI/Anthropic/Ollama)"];
tools [label="Tool Adapters\n(CI / FleetDM / HTTP)\n"];
runners [label="Runners / Devices / CI Workers"];
artifacts [label="Artifact Store\n(S3 / MinIO)"];
observ [label="Observability\n(Logs, Metrics, Tickets, Vector DB)"];
user -> lionagi;
lionagi -> models [label="LLM calls"];
lionagi -> tools [label="tool calls"];
tools -> runners [label="dispatch / webhook"];
runners -> artifacts [label="upload artifacts"];
runners -> tools [label="callback / status"];
lionagi -> observ [label="action logs & summaries"];
artifacts -> observ;
tools -> observ [style=dashed];
} (If you prefer Mermaid, I can include a Mermaid diagram as well.)
Deployment & scaling notes
- Run LionAGI controller as a service (k8s deployment) with autoscaling based on queue depth of incoming workflows.
- Model providers are external; use local model MCPs (Ollama, vLLM) where low-latency/on-prem inference is required.
- Runners (test agents) should be managed separately (FleetDM, k8s pods, VM Fleet) and expose a stable API to the tool adapters.
- Offload heavy artifact processing (video frames, large logs) to separate workers and reference via object URLs to keep the action logs small.
Security & safety
- Gate destructive tools behind allow_changes boolean and require human approval for high-risk workflows.
- Sign and verify callbacks from runners; use authentication tokens per adapter.
- Redact PII before storing artifacts or sending to third-party LLM providers. Use privacy-preserving embedding if needed.
- Rate-limit LLM usage and enforce cost budgets at the model provider layer.
Observability & reproducibility
- Store Branch histories and action logs in structured JSON; support exporting to DataFrames for analysis.
- Keep mappings between Branch runs and external artifacts/tickets for traceability.
- Add retry logic and idempotency keys to tools to avoid duplicate side-effects.
Guardrails & human-in-the-loop
- Include explicit review steps (“approval” tool) before PR merges or destructive remediation.
- Emit a natural-language runbook for any remediation action the agent proposes, and require a human confirmation token to proceed.
Recommended minimal stack for a PoC
- LionAGI controller (k8s or VM)
- One model provider (OpenAI or local Ollama) configured via provider adapter
- Simple HTTP runner (small test harness) reachable by a Tool adapter
- S3-compatible artifact store (MinIO)
- Relational DB (Postgres) to index runs and metadata
- Observability: ELK or Loki + Grafana for dashboards
Starter recipe — generate typed test-plan → dispatch → summarize
This minimal starter includes Pydantic schemas, a Branch pseudocode flow, a tool adapter snippet, and runner contract. Adapt the code to the LionAGI API version you use.
Pydantic schemas
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from typing import List, Literal
class TestStep(BaseModel):
id: str
description: str
runner_selector: str # e.g., "fleet:ubuntu-22.04 tags:webserver"
command: str
timeout_seconds: int = 300
class TestPlan(BaseModel):
plan_id: str
objective: str
steps: List[TestStep]
class StepResult(BaseModel):
id: str
success: bool
stdout: str | None
stderr: str | None
artifacts: List[str] = [] # S3 URLs
class TestResultSummary(BaseModel):
plan_id: str
overall_success: bool
step_results: List[StepResult]
summary: str LionAGI Branch pseudocode
# Pseudocode — adapt to actual lionagi API
from lionagi import Branch, ModelProvider
provider = ModelProvider("openai", api_key=...)
branch = Branch(provider=provider, system_prompt="You are a QA planner. Return TestPlan JSON strictly matching the TestPlan schema.")
# 1) generate TestPlan from objective
objective = "Verify login flow on v2.1 for ubuntu webservers"
response = branch.call("Generate a TestPlan for the following objective:\n" + objective, response_schema=TestPlan)
plan: TestPlan = response.parsed
# 2) dispatch each step via tool call 'dispatch_test'
for step in plan.steps:
dispatch_payload = {"step_id": step.id, "runner_selector": step.runner_selector, "command": step.command}
# 'dispatch_test' is a tool adapter that triggers a runner and returns an execution_id
tool_result = branch.call_tool("dispatch_test", input=dispatch_payload)
# record tool_result in action log
# 3) poll or wait for callbacks from runners — once results arrive, feed back into branch
for result in collected_results:
branch.call("Process step result", input=result)
# 4) ask model to summarize final TestResultSummary
final = branch.call("Summarize the test run and produce a TestResultSummary JSON", response_schema=TestResultSummary)
summary: TestResultSummary = final.parsed
print(summary.json()) Tool adapter: simple HTTP dispatch (Flask example)
# A tiny runner adapter that LionAGI can call via HTTP
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
import requests
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/dispatch_test', methods=['POST'])
def dispatch_test():
payload = request.json
# choose a runner (simple round-robin or query FleetDM API)
runner_url = choose_runner(payload['runner_selector'])
res = requests.post(runner_url + '/run', json={"command": payload['command'], "timeout": payload.get('timeout_seconds', 300)})
# assume runner returns execution_id and callback_url
return jsonify(res.json())
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(port=8080) Runner contract (examples)
- /run POST { command, timeout } → { execution_id, status_url }
- Runner posts result to /callback with { execution_id, success, stdout, stderr, artifacts }
Notes
- Use allow_changes and human approvals for any destructive or write actions.
- Add idempotency keys when dispatching to avoid duplicates on retries.
- Attach logs/artifacts to S3 and reference them in the TestResultSummary.
Status: OK — updated 2025-11-07