LionAGI — expanded note

URL: https://github.com/khive-ai/lionagi

Status: OK

Quick summary

LionAGI is an orchestration framework / “intelligence OS” for building structured, multi-step AI workflows that combine LLMs, tool integrations, and programmatic validation. It emphasizes typed I/O (Pydantic), ReAct-style reasoning + acting, multi-model/provider support, and observability (action logs, branch histories). It’s designed for reproducible, debuggable agentic flows rather than one-off chat usage.

Core concepts (at a glance)

  • Branches (conversation / workflow contexts) to hold prompt state and history.
  • Pydantic-typed responses and validators to make outputs structured and machine-consumable.
  • ReAct-style flows: reason → call tool → observe → continue reasoning.
  • Tool adapters: user-provided code that LLMs can call (APIs, shell, CI, device-management).
  • Multi-provider model support: route tasks to different LLM providers or local engines.
  • Observability: message/action logs, DataFrame-friendly history export, verbose chain-of-thought for debugging.

Typical architectures & components

  • Model Provider Layer: OpenAI / Anthropic / Perplexity / Ollama / custom.
  • Orchestration Layer: LionAGI Branches & planners that decide which tools to call and how to sequence steps.
  • Tool Layer: adapters for external systems (HTTP APIs, CI runners, device managers, test harnesses).
  • Storage / Retrieval: optional RAG components (embedding stores, vector DB) integrated per-project.
  • Monitoring / Logging: store action logs for auditing, replay, and debugging.

Example workflows (concrete use cases)

  • Multi-step analysis: LLM synthesizes evidence, calls document-parse tool, then produces structured summary.
  • Programmatic test generation: convert user acceptance criteria into typed test steps (Pydantic schema), dispatch runners, collect results.
  • Autonomous triage: detect failure, fetch logs, summarize, create prioritized issue with suggested fix.
  • Continuous synthetic monitoring: scheduled runbooks that exercise endpoints/devices and create alerts + runbooks automatically.

Getting started (short)

  • Install (check repo for latest): pip install lionagi
  • Create a Branch, wire a model provider, define Pydantic schemas for structured outputs, and add tool adapters for external actions.
  • Use verbose ReAct mode for development to observe chain-of-thought before switching to production-safe modes.

(Implementation details and exact API calls are in the repo README — check https://github.com/khive-ai/lionagi.)

Best practices

  • Use Pydantic schemas to constrain model outputs; validate early.
  • Keep tooling adapters thin and idempotent. Log all inputs/outputs.
  • Add safety checks / human-in-the-loop gates for destructive actions.
  • Rate-limit model calls and cache repeated prompts/pieces of context where possible.
  • Instrument action logs for auditability — make logs exportable to DataFrames or logs storage.

Integrations to consider

  • CI systems: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins (to dispatch tests or create PRs).
  • Device management: FleetDM, MDM APIs for fleet-targeted tests or deployment checks.
  • Observability & metrics: Prometheus, Sentry, ELK — export run metrics and failures.
  • Issue trackers: GitHub Issues, Jira — auto-create and populate tickets with structured outputs.
  • Vector DBs & retrieval: Pinecone, Milvus, Weaviate — when combining with RAG.

Benefits / strengths

  • Strong emphasis on typed, validated outputs (reduces downstream brittleness).
  • Suited for complex, multi-step flows that require tool calls and branching logic.
  • Transparent debugging through verbose action logs and ReAct traces.
  • Multi-model flexibility for best-of-breed routing (e.g., one model for summarization, another for planning).

Limitations / risks

  • Not a turnkey product for any single application — you build adapters and schemas.

  • LLM cost and latency at scale — plan caching and rate-limits.

  • Automated remediation or destructive actions require strict guardrails and testing.

  • If you need heavy data-centric RAG features, you’ll likely need to integrate a separate indexing layer.

Architecture — orchestration & fleet patterns

This compact architecture shows how LionAGI fits as an orchestration layer for multi-step AI workflows (including QE/fleet use cases). It focuses on components, data flows, scaling considerations, and guardrails.

Goals

  • Use LionAGI to orchestrate typed, auditable workflows that combine LLM planning with deterministic tool actions.
  • Support dispatching work to a fleet of runners (CI agents, device agents, FleetDM-managed hosts).
  • Maintain observability, replayability, and safety for automated or semi-automated remediation.

High-level components

  • Model Provider Layer
    • Providers: OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, Ollama, internal models
    • Responsibilities: LLM inference, routing to best model per task
  • LionAGI Orchestration Layer
    • Branches: workflow contexts and histories
    • Planners/ReAct controllers: decide actions, call tools, loop until goal
    • Validators: Pydantic schemas and custom checks
    • Action logs: structured records of tool calls and agent reasoning
  • Tool & Adapter Layer
    • CI/API adapters: GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins
    • Device management adapters: FleetDM, MDM API, SSH, OTA services
    • Test harnesses: test runners, synthetic monitoring agents, fuzzers
    • Ticketing/Issue adapters: GitHub Issues, Jira
  • Storage & Retrieval
    • Artifact store: object storage (S3) for logs, screenshots, traces
    • Vector DB / RAG: Pinecone, Milvus, Weaviate for contextual retrieval
    • Metadata DB: lightweight relational DB for run metadata, indexing
  • Observability & Control Plane
    • Logging: ELK / Loki / structured logs (JSON), exportable DataFrames
    • Metrics & Alerts: Prometheus + Alertmanager, SLO dashboards
    • Human-in-the-loop UI: approvals, manual triage, PR review

Data flow (simple sequence)

  1. User or schedule triggers a workflow (goal) in LionAGI.
  2. Branch planner asks an LLM to decompose the goal into typed steps (Pydantic TestPlan).
  3. For each step, planner chooses a target runner using adapters (FleetDM query or CI tag) and dispatches via a tool call.
  4. Runner executes test, uploads artifacts to object store, and posts result to a callback endpoint or polled endpoint.
  5. LionAGI action log records the tool call and response; LLM reasons on results and decides next steps (retry, escalate, file issue).
  6. If issue creation is chosen, an adapter creates a ticket with a structured payload and links to artifacts.
  7. Final structured summary (Pydantic TestResultSummary) is emitted and stored with the run metadata.

Diagram (Graphviz)

digraph lionagi_arch {  
  rankdir=LR;  
  node [shape=box, style=rounded];  
  
  user [label="User / Scheduler"];  
  lionagi [label="LionAGI\n(Branch / Planner / Validators)"];  
  models [label="Model Providers\n(OpenAI/Anthropic/Ollama)"];  
  tools [label="Tool Adapters\n(CI / FleetDM / HTTP)\n"];  
  runners [label="Runners / Devices / CI Workers"];  
  artifacts [label="Artifact Store\n(S3 / MinIO)"];  
  observ [label="Observability\n(Logs, Metrics, Tickets, Vector DB)"];  
  
  user -> lionagi;  
  lionagi -> models [label="LLM calls"];  
  lionagi -> tools [label="tool calls"];  
  tools -> runners [label="dispatch / webhook"];  
  runners -> artifacts [label="upload artifacts"];  
  runners -> tools [label="callback / status"];  
  lionagi -> observ [label="action logs & summaries"];  
  artifacts -> observ;  
  tools -> observ [style=dashed];  
}  

(If you prefer Mermaid, I can include a Mermaid diagram as well.)

Deployment & scaling notes

  • Run LionAGI controller as a service (k8s deployment) with autoscaling based on queue depth of incoming workflows.
  • Model providers are external; use local model MCPs (Ollama, vLLM) where low-latency/on-prem inference is required.
  • Runners (test agents) should be managed separately (FleetDM, k8s pods, VM Fleet) and expose a stable API to the tool adapters.
  • Offload heavy artifact processing (video frames, large logs) to separate workers and reference via object URLs to keep the action logs small.

Security & safety

  • Gate destructive tools behind allow_changes boolean and require human approval for high-risk workflows.
  • Sign and verify callbacks from runners; use authentication tokens per adapter.
  • Redact PII before storing artifacts or sending to third-party LLM providers. Use privacy-preserving embedding if needed.
  • Rate-limit LLM usage and enforce cost budgets at the model provider layer.

Observability & reproducibility

  • Store Branch histories and action logs in structured JSON; support exporting to DataFrames for analysis.
  • Keep mappings between Branch runs and external artifacts/tickets for traceability.
  • Add retry logic and idempotency keys to tools to avoid duplicate side-effects.

Guardrails & human-in-the-loop

  • Include explicit review steps (“approval” tool) before PR merges or destructive remediation.
  • Emit a natural-language runbook for any remediation action the agent proposes, and require a human confirmation token to proceed.
  • LionAGI controller (k8s or VM)
  • One model provider (OpenAI or local Ollama) configured via provider adapter
  • Simple HTTP runner (small test harness) reachable by a Tool adapter
  • S3-compatible artifact store (MinIO)
  • Relational DB (Postgres) to index runs and metadata
  • Observability: ELK or Loki + Grafana for dashboards

Starter recipe — generate typed test-plan → dispatch → summarize

This minimal starter includes Pydantic schemas, a Branch pseudocode flow, a tool adapter snippet, and runner contract. Adapt the code to the LionAGI API version you use.

Pydantic schemas

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field  
from typing import List, Literal  
  
class TestStep(BaseModel):  
    id: str  
    description: str  
    runner_selector: str  # e.g., "fleet:ubuntu-22.04 tags:webserver"  
    command: str  
    timeout_seconds: int = 300  
  
class TestPlan(BaseModel):  
    plan_id: str  
    objective: str  
    steps: List[TestStep]  
  
class StepResult(BaseModel):  
    id: str  
    success: bool  
    stdout: str | None  
    stderr: str | None  
    artifacts: List[str] = []  # S3 URLs  
  
class TestResultSummary(BaseModel):  
    plan_id: str  
    overall_success: bool  
    step_results: List[StepResult]  
    summary: str  

LionAGI Branch pseudocode

# Pseudocode — adapt to actual lionagi API  
from lionagi import Branch, ModelProvider  
  
provider = ModelProvider("openai", api_key=...)  
branch = Branch(provider=provider, system_prompt="You are a QA planner. Return TestPlan JSON strictly matching the TestPlan schema.")  
  
# 1) generate TestPlan from objective  
objective = "Verify login flow on v2.1 for ubuntu webservers"  
response = branch.call("Generate a TestPlan for the following objective:\n" + objective, response_schema=TestPlan)  
plan: TestPlan = response.parsed  
  
# 2) dispatch each step via tool call 'dispatch_test'  
for step in plan.steps:  
    dispatch_payload = {"step_id": step.id, "runner_selector": step.runner_selector, "command": step.command}  
    # 'dispatch_test' is a tool adapter that triggers a runner and returns an execution_id  
    tool_result = branch.call_tool("dispatch_test", input=dispatch_payload)  
    # record tool_result in action log  
  
# 3) poll or wait for callbacks from runners — once results arrive, feed back into branch  
for result in collected_results:  
    branch.call("Process step result", input=result)  
  
# 4) ask model to summarize final TestResultSummary  
final = branch.call("Summarize the test run and produce a TestResultSummary JSON", response_schema=TestResultSummary)  
summary: TestResultSummary = final.parsed  
print(summary.json())  

Tool adapter: simple HTTP dispatch (Flask example)

# A tiny runner adapter that LionAGI can call via HTTP  
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify  
import requests  
  
app = Flask(__name__)  
  
@app.route('/dispatch_test', methods=['POST'])  
def dispatch_test():  
    payload = request.json  
    # choose a runner (simple round-robin or query FleetDM API)  
    runner_url = choose_runner(payload['runner_selector'])  
    res = requests.post(runner_url + '/run', json={"command": payload['command'], "timeout": payload.get('timeout_seconds', 300)})  
    # assume runner returns execution_id and callback_url  
    return jsonify(res.json())  
  
if __name__ == '__main__':  
    app.run(port=8080)  

Runner contract (examples)

  • /run POST { command, timeout } { execution_id, status_url }
  • Runner posts result to /callback with { execution_id, success, stdout, stderr, artifacts }

Notes

  • Use allow_changes and human approvals for any destructive or write actions.
  • Add idempotency keys when dispatching to avoid duplicates on retries.
  • Attach logs/artifacts to S3 and reference them in the TestResultSummary.

Status: OK — updated 2025-11-07