Ranking AI IDEs - which is best?
AI Summary
Summary of Video: Ranking the Best AI IDEs
Overview
- The video presents an opinionated comparison of various AI Integrated Development Environments (IDEs).
- The evaluation includes both proprietary and open-source options, recognizing their strengths and shortcomings.
IDEs Discussed
- Trey
- Pros: Visually appealing, completely free.
- Cons: Lacks essential functionality for serious coding. Recommended only for users on a tight budget.
- Zed
- Pros: Built for performance, appeals to Vim users.
- Cons: Poor AI integration, lacks basic autocomplete features. Rated low for AI functionality, despite its speed and performance.
- Klein
- Pros: Open source, support for model context protocol (MCP). Good community support.
- Cons: Can be laggy and makes frequent mistakes. Rated as a mid-tier IDE.
- GitHub Copilot
- Pros: Integrated with VS Code, offers robust autocomplete features.
- Cons: Disappointment in current functionalities and slow performance. Struggles with various coding tasks. Rated low.
- Wind Surf
- Pros: Good at inline edits and updating files seamlessly. Polished user interface.
- Cons: Pricing quirks. Rated high as a reliable option.
- Cursor
- Pros: Fastest growing AI IDE with innovative features like Yolo mode for automatic command execution. Excellent at iterating code and fixing errors. Recommended as the best overall IDE for productivity.
- Cons: None noted during the discussion.
Conclusion
- Cursor is positioned as the top choice for AI IDEs, with Wind Surf and Klein following. There’s an emphasis on the future potential of AI IDEs as technology evolves, with expectations of even more advanced capabilities across all platforms.